LEWANDROWSKI - WISE
TRANTOLO - YASZEMSKI - WHITE
ADVANCES IN SPINAL FUSION
(NHỮNG TIẾN BỘ TRONG ĐIỀU TRỊ KHỚP ĐỐT SỐNG)
PUBLISHER: MARCEL DEKKER (NEW YORK, 2004)
THÔNG TIN CHUNG:
Tiêu đề: Advances in Spinal Fusion (tạm dịch: Những tiến bộ trong điều trị khớp đốt sống).
Tác giả: Lewandrowski - Wise - Trantolo - Yaszemski - White.
NXB: Marcel Dekker (New York, 2004).
Thông số: 771 trang, 51 chương.
Cuốn sách tập trung đề cập tới những tiến bộ trong chuyên ngành chỉnh hình khớp đốt sống, từ các lý thuyết, cách chẩn đoán cho tới những công cụ, dụng cụ và phương pháp, phác đồ điều trị, hứa hẹn sẽ đem đến cho các bác sĩ, chuyên gia trong ngành những kiến thức hiểu biết quý giá trong việc xử lý các vấn đề liên quan đến khớp đốt sống như viêm khớp cột sống, thoái hóa cột sống, thoát vị đĩa đệm....
.JPG)
INTRODUCTION (GIỚI THIỆU):
Spinal fusion presents a challenge to all clinicians; The rate of failure can be high. Current approaches to the problem involve the mechanics and biology of spinal fusion. Extensive work is currently underway to improve healing and decrease the morbidity associated with conventional bone grafting using autologous material from the iliac crest. Less rigid implant systems, more bioactive and mechanically sound bone graft substitutes, and growth factor applications comprise some of the new approaches. Their clinical application has facilitated development of less invasive procedures, such as vertebroplasty. Experimental stimulation of spinal fusion has progressed to the DNA level, with the potential seen for gene therapy applications to overcome the problems with delivery vehicles for bone morphogenic protein (BMP) -based bone graft substitutes. Hence, alternative osteoinductive proteins and new delivery methods are currently under investigation and add to current concepts of local gene therapy for spine fusion. Cloned and sequenced complementary deoxyribonucleic acid (cDNA) Of novel osteoinductive proteins are being developed that may foster expression of the genes needed to initiate the cascade of osteoinduction. In fact, transient local gene therapy may prove applicable to the induction of bone formation, thereby offering new clinical treatments for patients with a variety of spine disorders.
CONTENTS (MỤC LỤC):
Preface
1 Reduction and Fixation of Sacroiliac Joint Dislocation by the Combined Use of S1 Pedicle Screws and an Iliac Rod
2 Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Fractures
3 Biomechanics of Vertebroplasty
4 Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty for the Treatment of Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures
5 Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Implants for Spinal Fusion: Biomechanical and Clinical Advantages of a New Material
6 Stand-Alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Constructs: Effect of Interbody Design, Bone Graft, and Bone Morphogenetic Protein on Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes
7 Overcoming Chemical Inhibition of Spine Fusion
8 Use of a Cloned Osteoprogenitor Cell in Spinal Fusion
9 Axially Loaded Computer Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lumbar Spine
10 Experience with OP-1 in a Rabbit Model of Lumbar Fusions
11 Structure and Function of Normal, Degenerate, and Surgically Fixed Spinal Segments
12 A Quantitatively Unstable Model to Evaluate the Biological Effects of Mechanical Forces on Spine Fusion
13 Ankylosing Spondylitis and Spinal Complications
14 Atlantoaxial Transarticular Screw Fixation: Indication, Technique, Risks, and Pitfalls
15 Biomechanics of Artificial Discs
16 Comparison of the Leukotactic Properties of Nucleus Pulposus, Anulus Fibrosus, and Cartilage Following Subcutaneous Injection in Pigs
17 Advances in Bone Graft Substitutes in Spinal Fusion
18 Titanium Mesh Cage in Spinal Reconstruction Surgery: Biomechanics and Clinical Application
19 Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the Brantigan I/F Cage
20 SF-36 Health Status and Oswestry Disability Index in Worker’s Compensation Patients with Neck Pain
21 Interbody Fusion in the Elderly
22 Choice of Anterior and Posterior Thoracolumbar Spinal Implants
23 Spondylotic Cervical Myelopathy: Clinical Aspects
24 Autogenous Free Fat Grafts After Posterior Lumbar Surgery
25 In Vitro Stability of Cervical Spine Cages
26 In Vivo Performance of Cervical Spine Cages
27 Autologous Growth Factors and Progenitor Cells as Effective Components in
28 Process of Lumbar Spinal Degeneration: Interrelationships Between Disc Degeneration and Facet Joint Osteoarthritis
29 Relationships Between Lumbar Sagittal Alignment and Clinical Outcomes After Decompression and Posterolateral Spinal Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
30 Histological Findings in Revision Surgery of Instrumented Spine Fusion with the Use of Coralline Hydroxyapatite
31 New Developments in Spinal Cord Monitoring
32 The Physical Properties and Biocompatibility of Plasma-Sprayed Hydroxyapatite Coating
33 Biomechanical Efficacy of Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty
34 Bioactive Bone Cement for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture
35 Advances in Technology and Spinal Fusion: A Clinician’s Perspective
36 Replacement of Autograft with BMP for Spinal Arthrodesis: Future Perspectives Following Recent Research
37 Occipitocervical Fusion for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Myelopathy
38 Validity of a Bioactive Ceramic Spacer in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Studies of the Stability of the Pedicle Screw for the Osteoporotic Spine In Vivo and In Vitro
39 Thoracic Pedicle Screws: Biomechanical Considerations of the Extrapedicular Approach
40 Two-Cage Reconstruction Versus Single Mega-Cage or Dual Nested Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion
41 Spontaneous Remission of Intervertebral Disc Hernia and Responses of Surrounding Macrophages
42 Gene Expression Profiling During Osteochondrogenic Events in the Spinal Region: Use in the Development of Promising Spinal Fusion
43 Cells, Signals, and Scaffolds: The Future of Spinal Fusion
44 Roentgen Stereometric Analysis: A Novel In Vivo Method to Assess Spinal Fusion
45 The Morbidity of Autogenous Bone Graft Donation
46 Loads on an Internal Spinal Fixation Device Measured In Vivo
47 New Anterior Cervical Instrumentation Systems Combining Intradiscal Cage with Integrated Plate: Biomechanics and Clinical Applications
48 Improvement of Pedical Screw Fixation with Hydroxyapatite Coating
49 Multilevel Cervical Decompression and Reconstruction
50 Decision Support Tools in Spinal Surgery: Artificial Neural Networks and Predictive Modeling
51 Porous Tantalum for Spinal Interbody Fusion
52 Advances in Spinal Fusion
REFERENCES (TÀI LIỆU THAM KHẢO):
1. Dujardin FH, Hossenbaccus M, Duparc F, Biga N, Thomine JM. Long-term functional prognosis of posterior injuries in high-energy pelvic disruption. J. Orthop. Trauma 1998; 12: 145–151.
2. Tile M. Pelvic ring fractures: Should they be fixed? J. Bone Joint Surg 1998; 70B: 1–12.
3. Vanderschot P, Daenens K, Broos P. Surgical treatment of post-traumatic pelvic deformities. Injury 1998; 29: 19–22.
4. Tile M. Classification. In: Tile M, ed. Fracture of the Pelvis and Acetabulum. 2d ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1995: 66–101.
5. Browner BD, Cole JD, Graham JM, Bondurant FJ, Nunchuck-Burns SC á, Colter HB. Delayed posterior internal fixation of unstable pelvic fractures. J. Trauma 1987; 27: 998–1006.
6. Cole JD, Blum DA, Anset LJ. Outcome after fixation of unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries. Clin. Orthop 1996; 329: 160–179.
7. Kellam JF, McMurtry RY, Paley D, Tile M. The unstable pelvic fracture: Operative treatment. Orthop. Clin. North. Am 1987; 18: 25–41.
8. Goldstein A, Phillips T, Sclafani SJA. Early open reduction and internal fixation of the disrupted pelvic ring. J. Trauma 1986; 26: 325–333.
9. Duwelius PJ, Van Allen M, Bray TJ, Nelson D. Computed tomography-guided fixation of unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. J. Orthop. Trauma 1992; 6: 420–426.
10. Failinger MS, McGanity PLJ. Current concept review: Unstable fractures of the pelvic ring. J. Bone Joint Surg 1992; 74A: 781–91.
11. Hirvensalo E, Lindahl J, Bo ¨stman O. A new approach to the internal fixation of unstable pelvic fractures. Clin. Orthop 1993; 297: 28–32.
12. Routt ML, Simonian PT, Ballmer F. A rational approach to pelvic trauma. Clin. Orthop 1995; 318: 61–74.
13. Shuler TE, Boone DC, Gruen GS, Peitzman AB. Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation: Early treatment for unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. J. Trauma 1995; 38: 453–458.
14. Ward EF, Tomasin J, Vander Griend RA. Open reduction and internal fixation of vertical shear pelvic fractures. J. Trauma 1987; 27: 291–295.
15. Cecil ML, Rollins JR, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting RA. Projection of the S2 pedicle onto the posterolateral surface of the ilium: A technique for lag screw fixation of sacral fractures or sacroiliac joint dislocations. Spine 21: 875–878. Â 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.
16. Routt ML, Simonian PT, Mills WJ. Iliosacral screw fixation: Early complications of the percutaneous technique. J. Orthop. Trauma 1997; 11: 584–589.
17. Templeman D, Schmidt A, Freese J, Weisman I. Proximity of iliosacral screws to neurovascular structures after internal fixation. Clin. Orthop 1996; 329: 194–198.
18. Pohlemann T, Bosch U, Ga ¨nsslen A, Tscherne H. The Hannover experience in management of pelvic fractures. Clin. Orthop 1994; 305: 69–80.
19. Shaw JA, Mino DE, Werner FW, Murray DG. Posterior stabilization of pelvic fractures by use of threaded compression rods: Case reports and mechanical testing. Clin. Orthop 1985; 192: 240–254.
20. Albert MJ, Miller ME, MacNaughton M, Hutton WC. Posterior pelvic fixation using a transiliac 4.5-mm reconstruction plate: A clinical and biomechanical study. J. Orthop. Trauma 1993; 7: 226–232.
21. Allen BL, Ferguson RL. The Galveston technique for L rod instrumentation of the scoliotic spine. Spine 1982; 7: 276–284.
22. Van Savage JG, Dahners LE, Renner JB, Baker CC. Fracture-dislocation of the lumbosacral spine: Case report and review of the literature. J. Trauma 1992; 33: 779–784.
23. Bents RT, France JC, Glover JM, Kaylor KL. Traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation: A case report and literature review. Spine 1996; 21: 1814–1819.
24. Cohn SL, Keppler L, Akbarnia BA. Traumatic retrolisthesis of the lumbosacral junction: A case report. Spine 1989; 14: 132–134.
25. Hanley EN, Knox BD, Ramasastry S, Moossy JJ. Traumatic lumbopelvic spondyloptosis: A case report. J. Bone Joint Surg 1993; 75A: 1695–1698.
26. Abumi K, Saita M, Iida T, Kaneda K. Reduction and fixation of sacroiliac joint dislocation by the combined use of S1 pedicle screw and the Galveston technique. Spine 2000; 25: 1977–1983.
27. Korovessis P, Stamatakis M, Baikousis A. Posterior stabilization of unstable sacroiliac injuries with the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital spinal instrumentation. Orthopedics 2000; 23: 323–327.
28. Korovessis P. Letter to the Editor RE: Reduction and fixation of sacroiliac joint dislocation by the combined use of S1 pedicle screw and the Galveston technique. Spine 2001; 26: 1640–1641.
29. Abumi K. In Response to Letter to the Editor. RE: Reduction and fixation of sacroiliac joint dislocation by the combined use of S1 pedicle screws and the Galveston technique. Spine 2001; 26: 1641.
30. Burgess A. External fixation. In: Tile M, ed. Fracture of the Pelvis and Acetabulum. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1995: 135–149.
31. Stocks GW, Gabel GT, Noble PC, Hanson GW, Tullos HS. Anterior and posterior internal fixation of vertical shear fractures of the pelvis. J. Orthop. Res 1991; 9: 237–245.
32. Ruland CM, McAfee PC, Warden KE, Cunningham BW. Triangulation of pedicular instrumentation: A biomechanical study. Spine 1991; 16: S270–S276.
33. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Widell EH. A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. Clin. Orthop 1986; 203: 99–112.
34. Camp JF, Caudle R, Ashmun RD, Roach J. Immediate complications of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation to the sacro-pelvis: A clinical and biomechanical study. Spine 1990; 15: 932–941.
35. McCord DH, Cunningham BW, Shono Y, Myers JJ, McAfee PC. Biomechanical analysis of lumbosacral fixation. Spine 1992; 17: S235–243.
36. Simonian PT, Routt ML. Biomechanics of pelvic fixation. Orthop. Clin. North Am 1997; 28: 351–367.
37. Varga E, Hearn T, Powell J, Tile M. Effects of method of internal fixation of symphyseal disruptions on stability of the pelvic ring. Injury 1995; 26: 75–80.
================================
Nhận xét
Đăng nhận xét