Chuyển đến nội dung chính

gia tri cac xet nghiem amh, fsh va afc du doan dap ung buong trung trong thu tinh ong nghiem

DAI HOC Y DUOC THANH PHO HO CHI MINH


LUAN AN TIEN SI Y HOC

GIA TRI CAC XET NGHIEM AMH, FSH VA AFC DU DOAN DAP UNGBUONG TRUNG TRONG THU TINH ONG NGHIEM


CHUYEN NGANH: SAN PHU KHOA - MA SO: 62720131

NCS VUONG THI NGOC LAN - HDKH PGS. TS. VO MINH TUAN



Kich thich buong trung (KTBT) La mot cong doan quan trong va duoc ap dung thuong quy trong quy trinh thu tinh ong nghiem (TTON). KTBT lam tang so luong noan thu duoc, la dieu kien can de chuan bi tot nhat cho cac buoc tiep theo nhu tao phoi va chon lua phoi chuyen vao buong tu cung nham gia tang co hoi co thai cho chu ky dieu tri. Dap ung cua buong trung voi KTBT duoc the hien bang so luong noan thu duoc. So luong noan phu hop giup tao duoc mot so luong phoi tot, mang lai co hoi co thai cao ma ti le qua kich buong trung thap.

Ngoai ra, so luong phoi thua con duoc tru lanh de su dung cho cac lan chuyen phoi sau, giup tang ti le co thai cong don cua mot chu ky KTBT. So luong noan qua nhieu khong lam tang co hoi thanh cong nhung tang nguy co qua kich buong trung va giam ti le lam to cua phoi. Nguoc lai, so luong noan qua it co lien quan voi ti le thai lam sang thap tang ti le huy chu ky do khong du noan de thu tinh, tang chi phi vat chat va ganh nang tinh than cho benh nhan.

Du doan dap ung BT co y nghia lon, la co so de tu van truoc dieu tri cho benh nhan ve cac nguy co cua KTBT va xac suat thanh cong cua thu tinh ong nghiem (TTON). Dua tren ket qua du doan dap ung buong trung, cac bac si lam sang dua ra quyet dinh phu hop trong viec chon lua phuong phap dieu tri, phac do KTBT va lieu thuoc KTBT. Du doan dap ung buong trung thuong thong qua cac dac diem lam sang cua benh nhan hay cac xet nghiem khao sat du tru buong trung.

Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Co ban la loai xet nghiem da duoc su dung tu lau, gan day, Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH), Antral Follicle Count (AFC) Cung duoc phat trien va dua vao ap dung lam sang. Nhieu nghien cuu da duoc thuc hien nham khao sat gia tri cua AMH, FSH va AFC de du doan cac dap ung buong trung bat thuong, tuy nhien, da so cac nghien cuu co co mau nho, tieu chuan chan doan dap ung buong trung bat thuong khac nhau, cac loai xet nghiem va phuong phap do luong khac nhau. Co 2 phan tich gop duoc thuc hien nham so sanh gia tri cua AMH, FSH va AFC de du doan dap ung buong trung kem va cua AMH voi AFC de du doan dap ung buong trung nhieu nhung cac nghien cuu duoc chon vao phan tich khong dong chat nen van chua the dua ra gia tri nguong thong nhat cua cac xet nghiem de su dung trong lam sang. Ngoai ra, gia tri cac xet nghiem duoc ghi nhan la khac nhau giua cac chung toc, bi tac dong boi cac dac diem lam sang va loi song cua benh nhan, do do, can thuc hien nghien cuu trong nhieu nhom dan so khac nhau de tim gia tri nguong dac hieu cho dan so truoc khi ung dung vao lam sang.

Tai Viet Nam, ky thuat thu tinh ong nghiem (TTON) ngay cang pho bien voi so chu ky dieu tri tang qua tung nam. KTBT duoc ap dung thuong quy cho hau nhu tat ca cac chu ky dieu tri. Truoc day, chi co FSH co ban la xet nghiem duoc dung de khao sat du tru va dap ung buong trung, sau do co them AFC va chi moi khoang 3 nam gan day, AMH duoc su dung rat pho bien o cac trung tam TTON. Mot so van de duoc ghi nhan tu viec su dung cac xet nghiem tren trong du doan dap ung buong trung la:

(i) Chua co gia tri tham khao cua nguoi Viet Nam,
(ii) Chua biet xet nghiem nao (trong dieu kien thuc hien tai Viet Nam) Co gia tri tot hon de dua vao do ma ra quyet dinh lam sang, nhat la trong truong hop ket qua cac xet nghiem khong thong nhat, va
(iii) Hien nay, co nhieu trung tam dang thuc hien ca 3 loai xet nghiem cho moi benh nhan, neu co mot hay cac xet nghiem nao duoc chung minh co gia tri tot hon, co the giam so xet nghiem can thuc hien, tiet kiem chi phi va thoi gian cho benh nhan. Nghien cuu ve du doan dap ung buong trung o benh nhan nguoi Viet Nam chua nhieu. Nguyen Xuan Hoi va cong su (2009) Ghi nhan FSH co ban va nong do estradiol la 2 yeu to tien luong doc lap cua dap ung buong trung kem. Cac nghien cuu khac ghi nhan AMH co tuong quan tot voi so luong noan thu duoc o benh nhan TTON va AMH co gia tri du bao nguy co qua kich buong trung. Tuy nhien, mot so nghien cuu co co mau nho, dieu kien bao quan mau xet nghiem chua dam bao va tieu chuan chan doan dap ung buong trung kem hoac nhieu cung khac nhau. Chua co nghien cuu so sanh gia tri cua cac xet nghiem AMH, FSH va AFC de du doan dap ung buong trung.

Chung toi thuc hien de tai nham tra loi cau hoi nghien cuu nhu sau:

1. Trong so cac xet nghiem AMH, FSH va AFC, xet nghiem nao co gia tri tot nhat de du doan dap ung buong trung kem hoac nhieu?

2. Gia tri nguong nao cua cac xet nghiem AMH, FSH va AFC de du doan dap ung buong trung kem hoac nhieu?





MUC LUC
Danh muc cac ky hieu, cac chu viet tat
Danh muc doi chieu Anh – Viet
Danh muc cac bang
Danh muc cac hinh, so do, bieu do
DAT VAN DE MUC TIEU NGHIEN CUU
Chuong 1. TONG QUAN TAI LIEU
1.1. Kich thich buong trung
1.2. Dap ung buong trung
1.3. Cac xet nghiem du doan dap ung buong trung dang duocsu dung pho bien
1.4. So sanh gia tri cac xet nghiem AMH, FSH va AFC trong dudoan dap ung buong trung
1.5. Mo hinh du doan dap ung buong trung
1.6. Nghien cuu ve du doan dap ung buong trung tai Viet Nam
1.7. Tong hop cac van de lien quan den de tai nghien cuu
Chuong 2. DOI TUONG VA PHUONG PHAP NGHIEN CUU
2.1. Thiet ke nghien cuu
2.2. Doi tuong nghien cuu
2.3. Co mau
2.4. Cach chon mau
2.5. Dia diem va thoi gian tien hanh nghien cuu
2.6. Phuong phap tien hanh
2.7. Phuong phap phan tich so lieu
2.8. Dao duc nghien cuu
Chuong 3. KET QUA NGHIEN CUU
3.1. Cac dac diem cua doi tuong nghien cuu
3.2. So sanh gia tri du doan va xac dinh gia tri nguong cua cac xetnghiem AMH, FSH va AFC de du doan dap ung buong trung
3.3. Mo hinh du doan dap ung buong trung
Chuong 4. BAN LUAN
4.1. Tinh cap thiet cua de tai nghien cuu
4.2. Phuong phap nghien cuu
4.3. Ket qua nghien cuu
4.4. Diem manh va han che cua nghien cuu
4.5. Ung dung ket qua nghien cuu vao lam sang
4.6. Y nghia khoa hoc cua de tai nghien cuu
KET LUAN
KIEN NGHI
DANH MUC CAC CONG TRINH LIEN QUAN DEN LUAN AN
TAI LIEU THAM KHAO
PHU LUC
Phu luc 1. Phuong phap dinh luong AMH
Phu luc 2. Phuong phap dinh luong FSH
Phu luc 3. Bang xac suat du doan dap ung buong trung kem dua tren AMH va AFC
Phu luc 4. Bang xac suat du doan dap ung buong trung nhieu dua tren AMH va AFC
Phu luc 5. Quyet dinh cua Hoi dong Dao duc cho phep thuc hien nghien cuu
Phu luc 6. Quyet dinh cho phep thu thap so lieu cua benh vien An Sinh
Phu luc 7. Bang thu thap so lieu
Phu luc 8. Phieu thong tin cho benh nhan ve nghien cuu
Phu luc 9. Ban cam ket tham gia nghien cuu
Phu luc 10. Danh sach benh nhan tham gia nghien cuu
DANH MUC CAC KY HIEU, CAC CHU VIET TAT
AMH Anti-Mullerian Hormone
AFC Antral Follicle Count
AIC Akaike Information Criterion
AUC Area Under Curve
BMI Body Mass Index
CRP C-Reactive Protein
FSH Follicle Stimulating Hormone
FTI Free Testosterone Index
GnRH Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone
GnRHa Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonist
GnRHanta Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone AntagonisthCG human Chorionic Gonadotropin
Hct Hematocrit
KTC Khoang tin cay
KTBT Kich thich buong trung
LH Luteinizing Hormone
LR Likelihood Ratio
NPV Negative Predictive Value
OR Odds ratio
PPV Positive Predictive Value
ROC Receiver Operating Characteristic
TTON Thu tinh ong nghiem
DANH MUC DOI CHIEU ANH – VIET
American Society for Reproductive Medicine ASRM Hiep Hoi Y hoc sinh san Hoa Ky
Asia Pacific Initiative on Reproduction ASPIRE Hiep Hoi Y hoc sinh san Chau A Thai Binh Duong
Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor b_FGF Yeu to tang truong nguyen baosoi co ban
Bioassays Xet nghiem sinh hoc
Diagnostic System Lab DSL Phuong phap xet nghiem DSL
Electrochemilunescence Mien dich dien hoa phat quang
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ELISA Mien dich gan ket men
Epidermal Growth Factor EGF Yeu to tang truong ngoai bi
European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology ESHRE Hiep Hoi Y hoc sinh san Nguoiva Phoi hoc chau Au
International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies ICMART Uy ban giam sat cac ky thuat hotro sinh san
Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection ICSI Tiem tinh trung vao bao tuongnoan
In-vitro Maturation IVM Truong thanh noan trong ongnghiem
Immunoassays Xet nghiem mien dich
Insulin-like growth factor IGF-1 Yeu to tang truong giong insulinnhom
Interferons IFNs Khang the duoc tao ra va giaiphong boi te bao ky chu
Immunotech IOT Phuong phap xet nghiem IOT
Lithium heparin plasma Li-heparinplasma
Huyet thanh chua trong ongnghiem trang voi muoi Lithiumcua Heparin
Metaphase II MII Pha trung ky cua giam phan II
Physicochemical assays Xet nghiem hoa ly
Power Do manh kiem dinh
Recombinant human Chorionic
GonadotropinrhCG hCG tai to hop
Recombinant Follicle Stimulating HormonerFSH FSH tai to hop
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences SPSS Phan mem thong ke cho khoahoc xa hoi
Transforming Growth Factor a TGF-a Yeu to tang truong bien doialpha
Transforming Growth Factor a TGF-a Yeu to tang truong bien doi beta
Tumor Necrosis Factor TNF Yeu to hoai tu u
Tumor Necrosis Factor Binding Protein I TNF_BP I Protein gan ket yeu to hoai tu uloai I
Vascular Epithelial Growth Factor VEGF Yeu to tang truong noi mo machmau
World Health Organization WHO To chuc Y te the gioi
World Health Organization 2nd WHO 2nd
International Reference Preparation IRP


Chuan tham khao quoc te ve xetnghiem cua To chuc Y te the gioiphien ban II
DANH MUC CAC BANG
Bang 1.1. Dac diem cac loai xet nghiem AMH hien dang su dung vanghien cuu
Bang 1.2. Gia tri nguong cua AMH du doan dap ung buong trung kem
Bang 1.3. Gia tri nguong cua AMH du doan dap ung buong trung nhieu
Bang 1.4. Gia tri nguong cua AFC du doan dap ung buong trung kemhoac nhieu
Bang 1.5. Nghien cuu so sanh gia tri cac xet nghiem AMH, FSH va AFCdu doan so noan choc hut duoc
Bang 1.6. Mo hinh don bien va da bien du doan dap ung buong trung kem
Bang 1.7. Tom luoc cac mo hinh du doan dap ung kem hoac nhieu (phantich lai tu cac thu nghiem lam sang co nhom chung)
Bang 2.1. Co mau can thiet de phat hien su khac biet giua 2 dien tich duoiduong cong ROC AUC1 (f1) Va AUC2 (f2)
Bang 2.2. Dien tich duoi duong cong ROC du doan dap ung kem hoacnhieu cua cac xet nghiem AMH, FSH va AFC
Bang 2.3. Lieu FSH trung binh/ ngay va lieu dau FSH duoc chon theo cacnhom tuoi
Bang 2.4. Cac bien so nghien cuu can thu thap
Bang 3.1. Dac diem dan so - xa hoi cua doi tuong nghien cuu
Bang 3.2. Dac diem lam sang cua doi tuong nghien cuu
Bang 3.3. Gia tri cac xet nghiem AMH, FSH va AFC truoc kich thichbuong trung cua doi tuong nghien cuu
Bang 3.4. Dac diem kich thich buong trung cua doi tuong nghien cuu
Bang 3.5. Ket qua choc hut noan va nuoi cay phoi
Bang 3.6. Ket qua chuyen phoi va bien chung cua thu tinh ong nghiem
Bang 3.7. So sanh gia tri cac xet nghiem AMH, FSH va AFC du doan dap ung kem
Bang 3.8. Gia tri nguong cac xet nghiem AMH, FSH va AFC du doan dap ung kem
Bang 3.9. So sanh gia tri cac xet nghiem AMH, FSH va AFC du doan dap ung nhieu
Bang 3.10. Gia tri nguong AMH, FSH va AFC du doan dap ung nhieu
Bang 3.11. Phan tich don bien cac dac diem cua doi tuong nghien cuu voidap ung kem
Bang 3.12. Phan tich da bien cac dac diem cua doi tuong nghien cuu voidap ung kem
Bang 3.13. So sanh dien tich duoi duong cong ROC cua cac mo hinh dudoan dap ung kem
Bang 3.14. Phan tich don bien cac dac diem cua doi tuong nghien cuu voidap ung nhieu
Bang 3.15. Phan tich da bien cac dac diem cua doi tuong nghien cuu voidap ung nhieu
Bang 3.16. So sanh dien tich duoi duong cong ROC cua cac mo hinh dudoan dap ung nhieu
Bang 4.1. So sanh ket qua kich thich buong trung giua cac nghien cuu
Bang 4.2. Cac nghien cuu so sanh gia tri cua cac xet nghiem AMH, FSHva AFC du doan dap ung kem
Bang 4.3. So sanh gia tri nguong cua cac xet nghiem AMH, FSH va AFCdu doan dap ung kem
Bang 4.4. So sanh gia tri nguong cua AMH du doan dap ung nhieu
Bang 4.5. Dien tich duoi duong cong ROC cua cac mo hinh du doan dap ung kem hoac nhieu
Bang 4.6. Tom tat cac dac diem cua xet nghiem du doan dap ung buong trung
DANH MUC CAC HINH
Hinh 1.1. Phac do dai phoi hop GnRH dong van va FSH
Hinh 1.2. Phac do phoi hop GnRH doi van va FSH
Hinh 1.3. Phac do ngan phoi hop GnRH dong van va FSH
Hinh 1.4. Su che tiet AMH trong buong trung
Hinh 2.1. Cach thuc hien AFC
Hinh 4.1. Cac yeu to tac dong len dap ung buong trung
DANH MUC CAC SO DO
So do 2.1. Qui trinh kich thich buong trung va theo doi su phat triennang noan
So do 2.2. Tom tat cac buoc thu thap so lieu
So do 3.1. So benh nhan tham gia cac cong doan cua qui trinh nghien cuu 67
DANH MUC CAC BIEU DO
Bieu do 1.1. Su thay doi nong do AMH trong suot doi song nguoi phu nu
Bieu do 1.2. Nong do AMH theo tuoi (sau tuoi 25)
Bieu do 1.3. Gia tri AFC theo tuoi o bach phan vi thu 3,10,25,50,75,90,97
Bieu do 1.4. So sanh gia tri AMH, FSH, inhibin va AFC du doan dap ungkem va nhieu o hai nhom benh nhan su dung HP-hMG va rFSH
Bieu do 1.5. So sanh AMH va AFC du doan dap ung nhieu
Bieu do 3.1. Muc do dap ung buong trung
Bieu do 3.2. Duong cong ROC cua AMH, FSH va AFC du doan dap ung kem
Bieu do 3.3. Duong cong ROC cua AMH, FSH va AFC du doan dap ungnhieu
Bieu do 3.4. Duong cong ROC cua 3 mo hinh du doan dap ung kem
Bieu do 3.5. Kiem dinh cua mo hinh AMH+ AFC du doan dap ung kem
Bieu do 3.6. Duong cong ROC cua 3 mo hinh du doan dap ung nhieu
Bieu do 3.7. Kiem dinh cua mo hinh AMH+ AFC du doan dap ung nhieu

 DANH MUC CAC CONG TRINH LIEN QUAN DEN LUAN AN
1. Vuong Thi Ngoc Lan, Vo Minh Tuan (2014). “So sanh gia tri du doan va do tin cay cua cac xet nghiem AMH, FSH va AFC doi voi dap ung nhieu o benh nhan thu tinh ong nghiem”. Y hoc Thanh pho Ho Chi Minh, tap 18, so 2, tr. 16-21.
2. Vuong Thi Ngoc Lan, Vo Minh Tuan (2014). “Gia tri cua AMH, FSH va AFC trong du doan dap ung kem voi kich thich buong trung thu tinh trong ong nghiem”. Tap chi Nghien cuu Y hoc, tap 87, so 2, tr. 15-19.
TAI LIEU THAM KHAO
Tai lieu tham khao tieng Viet
1. Bao cao so lieu nam cua don vi ho tro sinh san benh vien An Sinh (2011).
2. Cong thong tin dien tu Chinh phu nuoc Cong hoa xa hoi chu nghia Viet Nam. “Nghi dinh so 10/2015/ND-CP  cua Chinh phu: Quy dinh ve sinh con bang ky thuat thu tinh trong ong nghiem va dieu kien mang thai ho vi muc dich nhan dao” (2015). Http: //vanban. Chinhphu. Vn/portal/page/portal/ chinhphu/hethongvanban? Class_id=1&mode=detail&document_id=178798
4. Nguyen Van Tuan (2008). “Dien dich ket qua chan doan”. Y hoc thuc chung, Nha xuat ban Y hoc TPHCM, tr. 252-269.
5. Nguyen Xuan Hoi (2009). “Nghien cuu cac yeu to anh huong den ket qua kich thich buong trung va ti le thai lam sang trong IVF/ICSI”. Tai lieu Hoi thao Cac chuyen gia dieu tri hiem muon, Hoi Noi tiet Sinh san va Vo sinh TPHCM, tr. 25-29.
6. Nguyen Truong Nam. “Ung dung phan tich hoi quy”. Http: //thongke. Info. Vn/Download. Aspx/ 782A4C2002924D68B4A5FD0746C1BF60/1/ISMS_Regression_VIE. Pdf
7. Tran Thuy Anh (2013). “Nong do Anti-Mullerian Hormone cua benh nhan co nguy co qua kich buong trung”. Tai lieu Hoi thao Cac chuyen gia dieu tri hiem muon, Hoi Noi tiet Sinh san va Vo sinh TPHCM, Chi hoi Y hoc sinh san Viet Nam, tr. 75-79.
8. Vuong Thi Ngoc Lan, Giang Huynh Nhu, Ho Manh Tuong (2012). “Tuong quan giua nong do anti-mullerian hormone va dap ung buong trung trong thu tinh ong nghiem”. Tap chi Y hoc TPHCM, tap 16, phu ban so 1, chuyen de Suc khoe Sinh san va Ba me -Tre em, tr. 201-210.
Tai lieu tham khao tieng Anh
10. Aflatoonian A, Oskouian H, Ahmadi S, Oskouian L (2009). “Prediction of high ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: Anti-Mullerian hormone versus small antral follicle count (2–6mm)”. J Assist Reprod Genet 26, pp. 319–325.
11. Al-Azemi M, Killick SR, Duffy S, Pye C, Refaat B, Hill N, Ledger W (2011). “Multi-marker assessment of ovarian reserve predicts oocyte yield after ovulation induction”. Hum Reprod 26, pp. 414–422.
12. Al-Inany HG, Youssef MAFM, Aboulghar M, Broekmans FJ, Sterenburg MD, Smit JG, Abou-Setta AM (2011). “Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology”. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11 (5): CD001750.
13. Almog B, Shehata F, Shalom-Paz E, Tan SL, Tulandi T (2011). “Age-related normogram for antral follicle count: McGill reference guide”. Fertil Steril 95, pp. 663–666.
14. Anckaert E, Smitz J, Schiettecatte J, Klein BM, Arce JC (2012). “The value of anti-Mullerian hormone measurement in the long GnRH agonist protocol: Association with ovarian response and gonadotrophin-dose adjustments”. Hum Reprod 27, pp. 1829–1839.
15. Andersen AN, Witjes H, Gordon K, Mannaerts B (2011). “Predictive factors of ovarian response and clinical outcome after IVF/ICSI following a rFSH/GnRH antagonist protocol with or without oral contraceptive pre-treatment”. Hum Reprod 26, pp. 3413–3423.
16. Anderson RA, Themmen AP, Al-Qahtani A, GroomeNP, Cameron DA (2006). “The effects of chemotherapy and long-term gonadotrophin suppression on the ovarian reserve in premenopausal women with breast cancer”. Hum Reprod 21, pp. 2583–2592.
17. Anderson EL, Fraser A, McNally W, Sattar N, Lashen H, Fleming R, Nelson SM, Lawlor DA (2013). “Anti-mullerian hormone is not associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescent females”. PLOS One 8, pp. 64510.
18. AnshLabs picoAMH ELISA package insert (2014). Available at: Http: // anshlabs. Com/wp-content/uploads/inserts/AL124-i. Pdf (May 2014, date last accessed).
19. Arce JC, La Marca A, Mirner Klein B, Nyboe Andersen A, Fleming R (2013a). “Antimullerian hormone in gonadotropin releasing-hormone antagonist cycles: Prediction of ovarian response and cumulative treatment outcome in good-prognosis patients”. Fertil Steril 99, pp. 1644–1653.
20. Arce JC, la Marca A, Klein BM, Nyboe Andersen A, Fleming R (2013b). “Reply of the authors”. Fertil Steril 100, pp. 10.
21. ASRM Practice Committee (2012). “Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: A committee opinion”. Fertil Steril 98, pp. 1407-1415.
22. Baker ML, Metcalfe SA, Hutson JM (1990). “Serum levels of mullerian inhibiting substance in boys from birth to 18 years, as determined by enzyme immunoassay”. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70, pp. 11–15.
23. Bangham DR (1989). “Aspects by which assays may be characterized”. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 49 (Suppl 193), pp. 11–19.
24. Barad DH, Weghofer A, Gleicher N (2009). “Comparing anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) And follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) As predictors of ovarian function”. Fertil Steril 91, pp. 1553–1555.
25. Beckman Coulter (2010). “AMH Gen II ELISA package [n1]”. Available at http: // nml. By/files/ eb475149-020f-42e6-babf-11174eb8bbf3. Pdf.
26. Beckman Coulter (2012). “Immunotech AMH”. Available at http: // nml. By/files/ eb475149-020f-42e6-babf-11174eb8bbf3. Pdf.
27. Beckman Coulter (2013). “AMH Gen II ELISA package”. Available at https: // beckmancoulter. Com/wsrportal/page/itemDetails? ItemNumber=A73818 #2/10//0/25/1/0/asc/2/A73818///0/1//0/
28. Beckman Coulter (2014). “Access AMH Instructions for Use”. September 2014. REF B13127. Available at http: // beckmancoulter-amh. Com/en/wp-content/uploads/Introducing_the_ Access_ AMH_Assay. Pdf
29. Bentzen JG, Forman JL, Pinborg A, Lidegaard Ø, Larsen EC, Friis-Hansen L, Johannsen TH, Nyboe Andersen A (2012). “Ovarian reserve parameters: A comparison between users and non-users of hormonal contraception”. Reprod Biomed Online 25; Pp. 612–619.
30. Bentzen JG, Forman JL, Johannsen TH, Pinborg A, Larsen EC, Andersen AN (2013). “Ovarian antral follicle subclasses and anti-mullerian hormone during normal reproductive aging”. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98, pp. 1602–1611.
31. Bleil ME, Gregorich SE, Adler NE, Sternfeld B, Rosen MP, Cedars MI (2014). “Race/ethnic disparities in reproductive age: An examination of ovarian reserve estimates across four race/ethnic groups of healthy, regularly cycling women”. Fertil Steril 101, pp. 199–207.
32. Bonilla-Musoles F, Castillo JC, Caballero O, Perez-Panades J, Bonilla F Jr, Dolz M, Osborne N (2012). “Predicting ovarian reserve and reproductive outcome using anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) And antral follicle count (AFC) In patients with previous assisted reproduction technique (ART) Failure”. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 39, pp. 13–18.
33. Borini A, Lagalla C, Bonu MA, Bianchi V, Flamigni C, Coticchio G (2006). “Cumulative pregnancy rates resulting from the use of fresh and frozen oocytes: 7 years' experience”. Reprod Biomed Online 12, pp. 481-486.
34. Bourn Hall Clinic, Assisted Conception Unit (2009). “Protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF”. Standard Operating Process, version 1.0.
35. Broekmans FJ, Faddy MJ, Scheffer G, te Velde ER (2004). “Antral follicle counts are related to age at natural fertility loss and age at menopause”. Menopause 11, pp. 607–614.
36. Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB (2006). “A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome”. Hum Reprod Update 12 (6), pp. 685-718.
37. Broekmans FJM, de Ziegler D, Howles CM, Gougeon A, Trew G, Olivennes F (2010). “The antral follicle count: Practical recommendations for better standardization”. Fertil Steril 94 (3), pp. 1044-1051.
38. Broekmans FJ, Verweij PJ, Eijkemans MJ, Mannaerts BM, Witjes H (2014). “Prognostic models for high and low ovarian responses in controlled ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol”. Hum Reprod 29, pp. 1688–1697.
39. Broer SL, Dolleman M, Opmeer BC, Fauser BC, Mol BW, Broekmans FJM (2011). “AMH and AFC as predictors of excessive response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: A meta-analysis”. Hum Reprod Update 17 (1), pp. 46-54.
40. Broer SL, van Disseldorp J, Broeze KA, Bolleman M, Opmeer BC, Bossuyt P, Eijkemans MJ, Mol BW, Broekmans FI, IMPORT study group (2013). “Added value of ovarian reserve testing on patient characteristics in the prediction of ovarian response and ongoing pregnancy: An individual patient data approach”. Hum Reprod Update 19, pp. 26–36.
41. Cate RL, Mattaliano RJ, Hession C, Tizard R, FarberNM, Cheung A, Ninfa EG, Frey AZ, Gash DJ, Chow EP (1986). “Isolation of the bovine and human genes for Mullerian inhibiting substance and expression of the human gene in animal cells”. Cell 45, pp. 685–698.
42. Charleston JS, Hansen KR, Thyer AC, Charleston LB, Gougeon A, Siebert JR, Soules MR, Klein NA (2007). “Estimating human ovarian non-growing follicle number: The application of modern stereology techniques to an old problem”. Hum Reprod 22, pp. 2103–2110.
43. Deb S, Jayaprakasan K, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, Johnson IR, Raine-Fenning NJ (2009). “Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of automated antral follicle counts made using three-dimensional ultrasound and SonoAVC”. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33, pp. 477–483.
44. Deb S, Campbell BK, Pincott-Allen C, Clewes JS, Cumberpatch G, Raine-Fenning NJ (2012). “Quantifying effect of combined oral contraceptive pill on functional ovarian reserve as measured by serum anti-Mu¨llerian hormone and small antral follicle count using three-dimensional ultrasound”. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39, pp. 574–580.
45. Deb S, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, Pincott-Allen C, Raine-Fenning NJ (2013). “Intracycle variation in number of antral follicles stratified by size and in endocrine markers of ovarian reserve in women with normal ovulatory menstrual cycles”. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 41, pp. 216–222.
46. Delong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988). “Comparing areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristics curves: A nonparametric approach”. Biometrics 44, pp. 837–45.
47. Delvigne A, Rozenberg S (2002). “Epidemiology and preventon of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): A review”. Hum Reprod Update 8, pp. 559-577.
48. Dennis N, Denizot P, Lejeune C, Riviere D, Nicouleau L, Bord S, Marquet PY, Beckman Coulter Inc (2014). “Assessment of performance of an automated AMH immunoassay”. ESHRE abstract book, Munich 2014.
49. Dewailly D, Gronier H, Poncelet E, Robin G, Leroy M, Pigny P, Duhamel A, Catteau-Jonard S (2011). “Diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): Revisiting the threshold values of follicle count on ultrasound and of the serum AMH level for the definition of polycystic ovaries”. Hum Reprod 26, pp. 3123–3129.
50. Dolleman M, Verschuren WM, Eijkemans MJ, Dolle ME, Jansen EH, Broekmans FJ, van der Schouw YT (2013). “Reproductive and lifestyle determinants of anti-Mullerian hormone in a large population-based study”. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98, pp. 2106–2115.
51. Ebbel E, Katz A, Kao N, Cedars M (2011). “Reproductive aged women with cancer have a lower antral follicle count than expected”. Fertil Steril 96, pp. S199–S200.
52. EHSRE Capri Workshop Group (2005). “Fertility and ageing”. Hum Reprod Update 11, pp. 261-276.
53. Eldar-Geva T, Ben-Chetrit A, Spitz IM, Rabinowitz R, Markowitz E, Mimoni T, Gal M, Zylber-Haran E, Margalioth EJ (2005). “Dynamic assays of inhibin B, anti-Mullerian hormone and estradiol following FSH stimulation and ovarian ultrasonography as predictors of IVF outcome”. Hum Reprod 20, pp. 3178– 3183.
54. Elecsys AMH fact sheet (2014). Available at http: // cobas. Com/content/dam/cobas_com/ pdf/product/ Elecsys%20AMH/Elecsys%20AMH%20FactSheet. Pdf.
55. Elgindy EA, El-Haieg DO, El-Sebaey A (2008). “Anti-Mullerian hormone: Correlation of early follicular, ovulatory and midluteal levels with ovarian response and cycle outcome in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients”. Fertil Steril 89, pp. 1670–1676.
56. Elter K, Sismanoglu A, Durmusoglu F (2005). “Intercycle variabilities of basal antral follicle count and ovarian volume in subfertilewomen and their relationship to reproductive aging: A prospective study”. Gynecol Endocrinol 20, pp. 137–143.
57. Esposito MA, Coutifaris C, Barnhart KT (2002). “A moderately elevated day 3 FSH concentration has limited predictive value, especially in younger women”. Hum Reprod 17, pp. 118.
58. Fanchin R, Taieb J, Lozano DH, Ducot B, Frydman R, Bouyer J (2005). “High reproducibility of serum anti-Mullerian hormone measurements suggests a multi-staged follicular secretion and strengthens its role in the assessment of ovarian follicular status”. Hum Reprod 20, pp. 923–927.
59. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L (2011). “ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: The Bologna criteria”. Hum Reprod 26, pp. 1616–1624.
60. Ficicioglu C, Kutlu T, Baglam E, Bakacak Z (2006). “Early follicular antimullerian hormone as an indicator of ovarian reserve”. Fertil Steril 85, pp. 592–596.
61. Fleming R, Nelson SM (2012). “Reproducibility of AMH”. Hum Reprod 27, pp. 3639– 3641; Author reply pp. 3641–3632.
62. Fleming R, Fairbairn C, Blaney C, Lucas D, Gaudoin M (2013). “Stability of AMH measurement in blood and avoidance of proteolytic changes”. Reprod Biomed Online 26, pp. 130–132.
63. Freden B, Sjoblom P, Menezes J (2011). “Using anti-Mullerian hormone to identify a good prognosis group in women of advanced reproductive age”. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 51, pp. 411–415.
64. Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Lin H, Gracia CR (2012). “Anti-mullerian hormone as a predictor of time to menopause in late reproductive age women”. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, pp. 1673–1680.
65. Freour T, Mirallie S, Bach-Ngohou K, Denis M, Barriere P, Masson D (2007). “Measurement of serum anti-Mullerian hormone by Beckman Coulter ELISA and DSL ELISA: Comparison and relevance in assisted reproduction technology (ART)”. Int J Clin Chem 375, pp. 162–164.
66. Freour T, Masson D, Mirallie S, Jean M, Bach K, Dejoie T, Barriere P (2008). “Active smoking compromises IVF outcome and affects ovarian reserve”. Reprod Biomed Online 16, pp. 96–102.
67. Freour T, Masson D, Dessolle L, Allaoua D, Dejoie T, Mirallie S, Jean M, Barriere P (2012). “Ovarian reserve and in vitro fertilization cycles outcome according to women smoking status and stimulation regimen”. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285, pp. 1177–1182.
68. Fritz MA, Speroff L (2011). Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, USA, 8th edition, pp. 435-494.
69. Garcia JE, Jones GS, Acosta AA, Wright G (1983). “hMG/hCG follicular maturation for oocytes aspiration: Phase II. Fertil Steril 39, pp. 174-179.
70. Gassner D, Jung R (2014). “First fully automated immunoassay for anti-Mullerian hormone”. ClinChem Lab Med 52; Pp. 1143–1152.
71. Gigli I, Cushman RA, Wahl CM, Fortune JE (2005). “Evidence for a role for anti-Mullerian hormone in the suppression of follicle activation in mouse ovaries and bovine ovarian cortex grafted beneath the chick chorioallantoic membrane”. Mol Reprod Dev 71, pp. 480–488.
72. Gnoth C, Schuring AN, Friol K, Tigges J, Mallmann P, Godehardt E (2008). “Relevance of anti-Mullerian hormone measurement in a routine IVF program”. Hum Reprod 23, pp. 1359–1365.
73. Griesinger G, Diedrich K, Devroey P and Kolibianakis EM (2006). “GnRH agonist for triggering final oocyte maturation in the GnRH antagonist ovarian hyperstimulation protocol: A systematic review and meta-analysis”. Hum Reprod Update 12, pp. 159-168.
74. Grondahl ML, Nielsen ME, Dal Canto MB, Fadini R, Rasmussen IA, Westergaard LG, Kristensen SG, Yding AC (2011). “Anti-Mullerian hormone remains highly expressed in human cumulus cells during the final stages of folliculogenesis”. Reprod Biomed Online 22, pp. 389–398.
75. Hadlow N, Longhurst K, McClements A, Natalwala J, Brown SJ, Matson PL (2013). “Variation in antimullerian hormone concentration during the menstrual cycle may change the clinical classification of the ovarian response”. Fertil Steril 99, pp. 1791–1797.
76. Hagen CP, Sorensen K, Anderson RA, Juul A (2012). “Serum levels of antimullerian hormone in early maturing girls before, during, after suppression with GnRH agonist”. Fertil Steril 98, pp. 1326–1330.
77. Hamdine O, Eijkemans MJC, Lentjes EWG, Torrance HL, Macklon NS, Fauser BCJM, Broekmans FJ (2015). “Ovarian response prediction in GnRH antagonist treatment for IVF using anti-Mullerian hormone”. Hum Reprod 30, pp. 170-178.
78. Han X, McShane M, Sahertian R, White C, Ledger W (2013). “Pre-mixing samples with assay buffer is an essential pre-requisite for reproducible Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) Measurement using the Beckman Coulter Gen II assay (Gen II)”. Hum Reprod 28 (suppl 1): I76-i78, doi: 10.1093/humrep/ det181.
79. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982). “The meaning and use of the Area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve”. Radiology 143 (1), pp. 29-36.
81. Hansen KR, Morris JL, Thyer AC, Soules MR (2003). “Reproductive aging and variability in the ovarian antral follicle count: Application in the clinical setting”. Fertil Steril 80, pp. 577–583.
82. Hansen KR, Knowlton NS, Thyer AC, Charleston JS, Soules MR, Klein NA (2008). “A new model of reproductive aging: The decline in ovarian non-growing follicle number from birth to menopause”. Hum Reprod 23, pp. 699-708.
83. Hansen KR, Hodnett GM, Knowlton, N, Craig LTB (2011). “Correlation of ovarian reserve tests with histologically determined primordial follicle number”. Fertil Steril 95 (1), pp. 170-175.
84. Hehenkamp WJ, LoomanCW, Themmen AP, de Jong FH, Te Velde ER, Broekmans FJ (2006). “Anti-Mullerian hormone levels in the spontaneous menstrual cycle do not show substantial fluctuation”. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91, pp. 4057–4063.
85. Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Bancsi LF, Te Velde ER, Broekmans FJ (2005). “Antral follicle count in the prediction of poor ovarian response and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: A meta-analysis and comparison with basal follicle-stimulating hormone level”. Fertil Steril 83, pp. 291-301.
86. Honnma H, Baba T, Sasaki M, Hashiba Y, Oguri H, Fukunaga T, Endo T, Asada Y (2012). “Different ovarian response by age in an anti-Mullerian hormone-matched group undergoing in vitro fertilization”. J Assist Reprod Genet 29, pp. 117–125.
87. Hudson PL, Dougas I, Donahoe PK, Cate RL, Epstein J, Pepinsky RB, MacLaughlin DT (1990). “An immunoassay to detect human mullerian inhibiting substance in males and females during normal development”. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70, pp. 16–22.
88. Humaidan P, Kol S, Papanikolaou EG (2011). “GnRH agonist for triggering of final oocyte maturation: Time for a change of practice?”. Hum Reprod Update 17, pp. 510-524.
89. Humaidan P, Alsbjerg B (2014). “GnRHa trigger for final oocyte maturation: Is hCG trigger history?”. Reprod BioMed 29, pp. 274-280.
90. Iglesias C, Banker M, Mahajan N, Herrero L, Meseguer M, Garcia-Velasco JA (2014). “Ethnicity as a determinant of ovarian reserve: Differences in ovarian aging between Spanish and Indian women”. Fertil Steril 102, pp. 244–249.
91. Iliodromiti S, Kelsey TW, Anderson RA, Nelson SM (2013a). “Can anti-Mullerian hormone predict the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome? A systematic review and meta-analysis of extracted data”. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98, pp. 3332–3340.
92. Iliodromiti S, Kelsey TW, Anderson RA, Nelson SM (2013b). “Impact of GnRHagonist triggering and intensive luteal steroid support on live-birth rates and overian hyperstimulation syndrome: A retrospective cohort study”. J Ovarian Res 6 (1): 93. Doi: 10.1186/1757-2215-6-93.
94. Ishihara O, Adamson GD, Dyer S, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, Sullivan EA, Zegers-Hochschild S, Mansour A (2015). “International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies: World Report on Assisted Reproductive Technologies, 2007”. Fertil Steril 103, pp. 402-413e11.
95. Jayaprakasan K, Hilwah N, Kendall NR, Hopkisson JF, Campbell BK, Johnson IR, Raine-Fenning NJ (2007). “Does 3D ultrasound offer any advantage in the pre-treatment assessment of ovarian reserve and prediction of outcome after assisted reproduction treatment?”. Hum Reprod 22, pp. 1932–1941.
96. Jayaprakasan K, Campbell BK, Hopkisson JF, Clewes JS, Johnson IR, Raine-Fenning NJ (2008a). “Effect of pituitary desensitization on the early growing follicular cohort estimated using anti-Mullerian hormone”. Hum Reprod 23, pp. 2577–2583.
97. Jayaprakasan K, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, Johnson IR, Raine-Fenning NJ (2008b). “Threedimensional ultrasound improves the interobserver reliability of antral follicle counts and facilitates increased clinical work flow”. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31, pp. 439–444.
98. Jayaprakasan K, Campbell B, Hopkisson J, Johnson I, Raine-Fenning N (2010a). “A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Mu¨llerian hormone, inhibin-B, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation”. Fertil Steril 93, pp. 855–864.
99. Jayaprakasan K, Deb S, Batcha M, Hopkisson J, Johnson I, Campbell B, Raine-Fenning N (2010b). “The cohort of antral follicles measuring 2–6 mm reflects the quantitative status of ovarian reserve as assessed by serum levels of anti-Mullerian hormone and response to controlled ovarian stimulation”. Fertil Steril 94, pp. 1775–1781.
100. Jeppesen JV, Anderson RA, KelseyTW, Christiansen SL, Kristensen SG, Jayaprakasan K, Raine-Fenning N, Campbell BK, Yding Andersen C (2013). “Which follicles make the most anti-Mullerian hormone in humans? Evidence for an abrupt decline in AMH production at the time of follicle selection”. Mol Hum Reprod 19, pp. 519–527.
101. Ji J, Liu Y, Tong, XH, Luo L, Ma J, Chen Z (2013). ‘The optimum number of oocytes in IVF treatment: An analysis of 2455 cycles in China”. Hum Reprod 28, pp. 2728-2734.
102. Joo BS, Park SH, An BM, Kim KS, Moon SE, Moon HS (2010). “Serum oestradiol levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation influence the pregnancy outcome of in vitro fertilization in a concentrationdependent manner”. Fertil Steril 93, pp. 442–446.
103. Josso N, Legeai L, Forest MG, Chaussain JL, Brauner R (1990). “An enzyme linked immunoassay for anti-mullerian hormone: A new tool for the evaluation of testicular function in infants and children”. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70, pp. 23–27.
104. Kallio S, Puurunen J, Ruokonen A, Vaskivuo T, Piltonen T, Tapanainen JS (2013). “Antimullerian hormone levels decrease in women using combined contraception independently of administration route”. Fertil Steril 99, pp. 1305–1310.
105. Kelsey TW, Wright P, Nelson SM, Anderson RA, Wallace WH (2011). “A validated model of serum anti-Mullerian hormone from conception to menopause”. PloS one 6, pp. 22024.
106. Kevenaar ME, Meerasahib MF, Kramer P, van de Lang-Born BM, de Jong FH, Groome NP, Themmen AP, Visser JA (2006). “Serum anti-mullerian hormone levels reflect the size of the primordial follicle pool in mice”. Endocrinology 147, pp. 3228–3234.
107. Kissell KA, Danaher MR, Schisterman EF, Wactawski-Wende J, Ahrens KA, Schliep K, Perkins NJ, Sjaarda L, Weck J, Mumford SL (2014). “Biological variability in serum anti-Mu¨llerian hormone throughout the menstrual cycle in ovulatory and sporadic anovulatory cycles in eumenorrheic women”. Hum Reprod 2014; 29, pp. 1764–1772.
108. Klonoff-Cohen H, Natarajan L, Klonoff E (2007). “Validation of a new scale for measuring Concerns of Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technologies (CART)”. J Health Psychol 12, pp. 352-356.
109. Kumar A, Kalra B, Patel A, McDavid L, Roudebush WE (2010). “Development of a second generation anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) ELISA”. J Immunol Methods 362, pp. 51–59.
110. Kwee J, Elting ME, Schats R, McDonnell J, Lambalk CB (2007). “Ovarian volume and antral follicle count for the prediction of low and hyper responders within vitrofertilization”. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 5, pp. 9.
111. Kwee J, Schats R, McDonnell J, Themmen A, de Jong F, Lambalk C (2008). “Evaluation of anti-Mu¨llerian hormone as a test for the prediction of ovarian reserve”. Fertil Steril 90, pp. 737 –743.
112. La Marca A, Stabile G, Artenisio AC, Volpe A (2006). “Serum anti-Mullerian hormone throughout the human menstrual cycle”. Hum Reprod 21, pp. 3103–3107.
113. La Marca A, Sighinolfi G, Radi D, Argento C, Baraldi E, Artenisio AC, Stabile G, Volpe A (2010). “Anti-Mu¨ llerian hormone (AMH) As a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART)”. Hum Reprod 16, pp. 113-130.
114. La Marca A, Spada E, Sighinolfi G, Argento C, Tirelli A, Giulini S, Milani S, Volpe A (2011). “Age-specific nomogram for the decline in antral follicle count throughout the reproductive period”. Fertil Steril 95, pp. 684–688.
116. Lan VTN, Linh NK, Tuong HM, Wong PC, Howles CM (2013). “Anti-Mullerian hormone versus antral follicle count for defining the starting dose of FSH”. Reprod BioMed 27, pp. 390-399.
117. Lauritsen MP, Bentzen JG, Pinborg A, Loft A, Forman JL, Thuesen LL, Cohen A, Hougaard DM, Nyboe Andersen A (2014). “The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a normal population according to the Rotterdam criteria versus revised criteria including anti-Mullerian hormone”. Hum Reprod 29, pp. 791–801.
118. Lawrenz B, Fehm T, vonWolff M, Soekler M, Huebner S, Henes J, Henes M (2012). “Reduced pretreatment ovarian reserve in premenopausal female patients with Hodgkin lymphoma or non-Hodgkin-lymphoma—evaluation by using antimullerian hormone and retrieved oocytes”. Fertil Steril 98, pp. 141–144.
119. Lee TH, Liu CH, Huang CC, Wu YL, Shih YT, Ho HN, Yang YS, Lee MS (2008). “Serum anti-Mullerian hormone and estradiol levels as predictors of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in assisted reproduction technology cycles”. Hum Reprod 23, pp. 160–167.
120. Lee KH, Kim SH, Jee BC, Kim YJ, Suh CS, Kim KC, Lee WD (2010). “Comparison of clinical characteristics between early and late patterns in hospitalized patients with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome”. Fertil Steril 93, pp. 2274–2280.
121. Lee RK, Wu FS, Lin MH, Lin SY, Hwu YM (2011). “The predictability of serum anti-Mullerian level in IVF/ICSI outcomes for patients of advanced reproductive age”. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 9, pp. 115.
122. Lee JE, Lee JR, Jee BC, Suh CS, Kim KC, Lee WD, Kim SH (2012). “Clinical application of anti-Mullerian hormone as a predictor of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation outcome”. Clin Exp Reprod Med 39, pp. 176–181.
123. Lekamge DN, Barry M, Kolo M, Lane M, Gilchrist RB, Tremellen KP (2007). “Anti-Mullerian hormone as a predictor of IVF outcome”. Reprod Biomed Online 14, pp. 602–610.
124. Li HW, NgEH, Wong BP, Anderson RA, HOPC, Yeung WS (2012). “Correlation between three assay systems for anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) Determination”. J Assist Reprod Genet 29, pp. 1443–1446.
125. Lolis, D. E., Tsolas, O., Messinis, I. E. (1995). “The follicle-stimulating hormone threshold level for follicle maturation in superovulated cycles”. Fertil Steril 63, pp. 1272–1277.
126. Long WQ, Ranchin V, Pautier P, Belville C, Denizot P, Cailla H, Lhomme C, Picard JY, Bidart JM, Rey R (2000). “Detection of minimal levels of serum anti-Mullerian hormone during follow-up of patients with ovarian granulosa cell tumor by means of a highly sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay”. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85, pp. 540–544.
127. Marci R, Lisi F, Soave I, Lo Monte G, Patella A, Caserta D, Moscarini M (2012). “Ovarian stimulation in women with high and normal body mass index: GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist”. Gynecol Endocrinol 28, pp. 792-795.
128. Mcilveen M, Skull JD, Ledger WL (2007). “Evaluation of the utility of multiple endocrine and ultrasound measures of ovarian reserve in the prediction of cycle cancellation in a high-risk IVF population”. Hum Reprod 22, pp. 778–785.
129. Melo MA, Garrido N, Alvarez C, Bellver J, Meseguer M, Pellicer A, Remohy J (2009). “Antral follicle count (AFC) Can be used in the prediction of ovarian response but cannot predict the oocyte/embryo quality or thein vitro fertilization outcome in an egg donation program”. Fertil Steril 91, pp. 148–156.
130. Merce LT, Gomez B, Engels V, Bau S, Bajo JM (2005). “Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of ovarian volume, antral follicle count, and vascularity indices obtained with transvaginal 3-dimensional ultrasonography, power Doppler angiography, and the virtual organ computer-aided analysis imaging program”. J Ultrasound Med 24, pp. 1279–1287.
131. Messinis IE, Templeton AA (1990). “The importance of follicle-stimulating hormone increase for folliculogenesis”. Hum Reprod 5, pp. 153–156.
132. MHRA (2013). “Urgent field safety notice-FSN 20434-3”. AMH Gen II ELISA (REF A79765). Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency.
133. Mutlu MF, Erdem M, Erdem A, Yildiz S, Mutlu I, Arisoy O, Oktem M (2013). “Antral follicle count determines poor ovarian response better than anti-mullerian hormone but age is the only predictor for live birth inin vitro fertilization cycles”. J Assist Reprod Genet 30, pp. 657–665.
134. Muttukrishna S, McGarrigle H, Wakim R, Khadum I, Ranieri DM, Serhal P (2005). “Antral follicle count, anti-mullerian hormone and inhibin B: Predictors of ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology?”. BJOG 112, pp. 1384–1390.
135. Nakhuda GS, SauerMV, Wang JG, Ferin M, Lobo RA (2007). “Mullerian inhibiting substance is an accurate marker of ovarian response in women of advanced reproductive age undergoing IVF”. Reprod Biomed Online 14, pp. 450–454.
136. Nardo LG, Gelbaya TA, Wilkinson H, Roberts SA, Yates A, Pemberton P, Laing I (2009). “Circulating basal anti-Mullerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization”. Fertil Steril 92, pp. 1586–1593.
137. Nelson SM, Yates RW, Fleming R (2007). “Serum anti-Mu¨llerian hormone and FSH: Prediction of live birth and extremes of response in stimulated cycles–implications for individualization of therapy”. Hum Reprod 22, pp. 2414–2421.
138. Nelson SM, Yates RW, Lyall H, Jamieson M, Traynor I, Gaudoin M, Mitchell P, Ambrose P, Fleming R (2009). “Anti-Mullerian hormone-based approach to controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted conception”. Hum Reprod 24, pp. 867–875.
139. Nelson SM, Stewart F, Fleming R, Freeman DJ (2010). “Longitudinal assessment of antimullerian hormone during pregnancy-relationship with maternal adiposity, insulin, and adiponectin”. Fertil Steril 93, pp. 1356–1358.
140. Nelson SM, Messow MC, Wallace AM, Fleming R, McConnachie A (2011). “Nomogram for the decline in serum antimüllerian hormone: A population study of 9,601 infertility patients”. Fertil Steril 95 (2), pp. 736-41.
141. Nelson SM (2013a). “Biomarkers of ovarian response: Current and future applications”. Fertil Steril 99 (4), pp. 963-969.
142. Nelson SM, Telfer EE, Anderson RA (2013b). “The ageing ovary and uterus: New biological insights”. Hum Reprod Update 19, pp. 67–83.
143. Nelson SM, Iliodromiti S, Fleming R, Anderson R, McConnachie A, Messow CM (2014). “Reference range for the antimullerian hormone Generation II assay: A population study of 10,984 women, with comparison to the established Diagnostics Systems Laboratory nomogram”. Fertil Steril 101, pp. 523–529.
144. Ocal P, Sahmay S, Cetin M, Irez T, Guralp O, Cepni I (2011). “Serum anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count as predictive markers of OHSS in ART cycles”. J Assist Reprod Genet 28, pp. 1197–1203.
145. Oehinger S, Nelson SM, Verwij P, Stegmann B (2013). “Predictive factors for ovarian response in a corifollitropin alfa/GnRH antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation”. Hum Reprod 28 (suppl 1), pp. I311–i356.
146. Overbeek A, Broekmans FJ, Hehenkamp WJ, Wijdeveld ME, van Disseldorp J, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Lambalk CB (2012). “Intra-cycle fluctuations of anti-Mullerian hormone in normal women with a regular cycle: A re-analysis”. Reprod Biomed Online 24; Pp. 664–669.
147. Pandian Z, McTavish AR, Aucott L, Hamilton MP, Bhattacharya S (2010). “Interventions for ‘poor responders’ to controlled ovarian hyper stimulation (COH) In in-vitro fertilisation (IVF)”. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD004379.
148. Penarrubia J, Fa´bregues F, Manau D, Creus M, Casals G, Casamitjana R, Carmona F, Vanrell JA, Balasch J (2005). “Basal and stimulation day 5 anti-Mullerian hormone serum concentrations as predictors of ovarian response and pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology cycles stimulated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist–gonadotropin treatment”. Hum Reprod 20, pp. 915–922.
149. Polyzos NP, Tournaye H, Guzman L, Camus M, Nelson SM (2013). “Predictors of ovarian response in women treated with corifollitropin alfa for in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection”. Fertil Steril 100 (2), pp. 430-437.
150. Popovic-Todorovic B, Loft A, Bredkjaeer HE, Bangsboll S, Nielsen IK, Andersen AN (2003). “A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing an individual dose of recombinant FSH based on predictive factors versus a 'standard' dose of 150 IU/day in 'standard' subjects undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment”. Hum Reprod 18 (11), pp. 2275-2282.
151. Purcell, K., Schembri, M., Frazier, L. M., Rall, M. J., Shen, S., Croughan, M., Grainger, D. A., Fujimoto, V. Y. (2007). “Asian ethnicity is associated with reduced pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology”. Fertil Steril 87, pp. 297–302.
152. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2008). “Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome”. Fertil Steril 90: S188–S193.
153. Riggs RM, Duran EH, Baker MW, Kimble TD, Hobeika E, Yin L, Matos-Bodden L, Leader B, Stadtmauer L (2008). “Assessment of ovarian reserve with anti-Mullerian hormone: A comparison of the predictive value of anti-Mullerian hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, inhibin B, and age”. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199, pp. 202. E1–202. E8.
154. Riggs R, Kimble T, Oehninger S, Bocca S, Zhao Y, Leader B, Stadtmauer L (2011). “Anti-Mu¨llerian hormone serum levels predict response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation but not embryo quality or pregnancy outcome in oocyte donation”. Fertil Steril 95, pp. 410–412.
155. Roberts JE, Spandorfer S, Fasouliotis SJ, Kashyap S, Rosenwaks Z (2005). “Taking a basal follicle-stimulating hormone history is essential before initiating in vi-tro fertilization”. Fertil Steril 83, pp. 37.
157. Schmidt L, Sobotka T, Bentzan JG, Andersen AN (2012). “Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood”. Hum Reprod Update 18, pp. 29-43
158. Schuh-Huerta SM, Johnson NA, Rosen MP, Sternfeld B, Cedars MI, Reijo Pera RA (2012). “Genetic variants and environmental factors associated with hormonal markers of ovarian reserve in Caucasian and African American women”. Hum Reprod 27, pp. 594–608.
159. Seifer DB, Golub ET, Lambert-Messerlian G, Benning L, Anastos K, Watts DH, Cohen MH, Karim R, Young MA, Minkoff H et al (2009). “Variations in serum mullerian inhibiting substance between white, black, and Hispanic women”. Fertil Steril 92, pp. 1674–1678.
160. Seifer DB, MacLaughlin DT, Christian BP, Feng B, Shelden RM (2002). “Early follicular serum mullerian-inhibiting substance levels are associated with ovarian response during assisted reproductive technology cycles”. Fertil Steril 77, pp. 468–
471.
161. Senatesa E, aolak Y, Erdem ED, Yesil A, Coskunpynar E, SahinO, Altunoz ME, Tuncer I, Kurdasa Ovunca AO (2013). “Serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels are lower in reproductive age women with Crohn’s disease compared to healthy control women”. J Crohns Colitis 7, pp. E29–e34.
162. Shoham Z and Howles CM (2012). Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques. Informa Healthcare, London, UK, 4th edition, pp. 51-74.
163. Silberstein T, MacLaughlin DT, Shai I, Trimarchi JR, Lambert-Messerlian G, Seifer DB, Keefe DL, Blazar AS (2006). “Mullerian inhibiting substance levels at the time of HCG administration in IVF cycles predict both ovarian reserve and embryo morphology”. Hum Reprod 21, pp. 159–163.
164. Sokievia PN, Carreras O, Tur R, Coroleu B, Barri PN (2007). “Sonographic assessment of ovarian reserve. Its correlation with outcome ofin vitro fertilization cycles”. Gynecol Endocrinol 23, pp. 206–212.
165. Sowers M, McConnell D, Gast K, Zheng H, Nan B, McCarthy JD, Randolph JF (2010). “Anti-Mullerian hormone and inhibin B variability during normal menstrual cycles”. Fertil Steril 94, pp. 1482–1486.
166. Strauss JF and Williams CJ (2009). The ovarian life cycle. Elsevier, Philadelphia, USA, pp. 155-190.
167. Su HI, Flatt SW, Natarajan L, DeMichele A, Steiner AZ (2013a). “Impact of breast cancer on anti-mullerian hormone levels in young women”. Breast Cancer Res Treat 137, pp. 571–577.
168. Su HI, Maas K, Sluss PM, Chang RJ, Hall JE, Joffe H (2013b). “The impact of depot GnRHagonist on AMH levels in healthy reproductive-aged women”. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98, pp. 1961–1966.
169. Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A (2011). “Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: An analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles”. Hum Reprod 26 (7), pp. 1768–1774.
170. Tarlatzis BC, Zepiridis L, Grimbizis G, Bontis J (2003). “Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: A systematic review”. Hum Reprod Update 9, pp. 61–76.
171. Te Velde ER and Pearson PL (2002). “The variability of female reproductive ageing”. Hum Reprod Update 8, pp. 141-154.
172. Tolikas A, Tsakos E, Gerou S, Prapas Y, Loufopoulos A (2011). “Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) Levels in serum and follicular fluid as predictors of ovarian response in stimulated (IVF and ICSI) Cycles”. Hum Reprod 14, pp. 246– 253.
173. Tsepelidis S, Devreker F, Demeestere I, Flahaut A, Gervy C, Englert Y (2007). “Stable serum levels of anti-Mullerian hormone during the menstrual cycle: A prospective study in normo-ovulatory women”. Hum Reprod 22, pp. 1837–1840.
174. Van Der Gaast MH, Beckers NG, Beier-Hellwig K, Beier HM, Macklon NS, Fauser BC (2002). “Ovarian stimulation for IVF and endometrial receptivity-the missing link”. Reprod Biomed Online 5, Suppl 1, pp. 36-43.
175. Van der Gaast MH, Eijkemans MJ, van der Net JB, de Boer EJ, Burger CW, van Leeuwen FE, Fauser BC, Macklon MS (2006). “Optimum number of oocytes for a successful first IVF treatment cycle”. Reprod Biomed Online 13, pp. 476-480.
176. Van Disseldorp J, Lambalk CB, Kwee J, Looman CW, Eijkemans MJ, Fauser BC, Broekmans FJ (2010). “Comparison of inter-and intra-cycle variability of anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle counts”. Hum Reprod 25, pp. 221–227.
177. Van Dorp W, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, de Vries AC, Pluijm SM, Visser JA, Pieters R, Laven JS (2014). “Decreased serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels in girls with newly diagnosed cancer”. Hum Reprod 29, pp. 337–342.
178. Van Houten EL, Themmen AP, Visser JA (2010). “Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH): Regulator and marker of ovarian function”. Ann Endocrinol 71, pp. 191–197.
179. Van Rooij IA, Broekmans FJ, te Velde ER, Fauser BC, Bancsi LF, de Jong FH, Themmen AP (2002). “Serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels: A novel measure of ovarian reserve”. Hum Reprod 17, pp. 3065 –3071.
180. Verberg MF, Verberg MF, Eijkemans MJ, Heijnen EM, et al (2008). “Why do couples drop-out from IVF treatment? A prospective cohort study”. Hum Reprod 23, pp. 2050–2055.
181. Wallace WH, Kelsey TW (2010). “Human ovarian reserve from conception to the menopause”. PLOS One 5, pp. 8772.
182. Wallace AM, Faye SA, Fleming R, Nelson SM (2011). “A multicentre evaluation of the new Beckman Coulter anti-Mullerian hormone immunoassay (AMH Gen II)”. Ann Clin Biochem 48, pp. 370–373.
183. Weenen C, Laven JS, Von Bergh AR, Cranfield M, Groome NP, Visser JA, Kramer P, Fauser BC, Themmen AP (2004). “Anti-Mullerian hormone expression pattern in the human ovary: Potential implications for initial and cyclic follicle recruitment”. Mol Hum Reprod 10, pp. 77–83.
184. Wellons MF, BatesGW, Schreiner PJ, Siscovick DS, Sternfeld B, Lewis CE (2013). “Antral follicle count predicts naturalmenopause in a population-based sample: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young AdultsWomen’s Study”. Menopause 20, pp. 825–830.
186. Wiweko B, Prawesti DM, Hestiantoro A, Sumapraja K, Natadisastra M, Baziad A (2013). “Chronological age vs biological age: An age-related normogram for antral follicle count, FSH and anti-Mullerian hormone”. J Assist Reprod Genet 30, pp. 1563–1567.
187. Wunder DM, Bersinger NA, Yared M, Kretschmer R, Birkha¨user MH (2008). “Statistically significant changes of antimu¨llerian hormone and inhibin levels during the physiologic menstrual cycle in reproductive age women”. Fertil Steril 89, pp. 927–933.
188. Yates AP, Rustamov O, Roberts SA, Lim HY, Pemberton PW, Smith A, Nardo LG (2011). “Anti-Mullerian hormone-tailored stimulation protocols improve outcomes whilst reducing adverse effects and costs of IVF”. Hum Reprod 26, pp. 2353–2362.
190. Yoo JH, Cha SH, Park CW, Kim JY, Yang KM, Song IO, Koong MK, Kang IS, Kim HO (2011). “Serum anti-Mullerian hormone is a better predictor of ovarian response than FSH and age in IVF patients with endometriosis”. Clin Exp Reprod Med 38, pp. 222–227.

Keywords:Luan an tien si y hoc,gia tri cac xet nghiem amh, fsh va afc du doan dap ung buong trung trong thu tinh ong nghiem,san phu khoa  ,62720131,vuong thi ngoc lan,pgsts vo minh tuan


LINK DOWNLOAD LUAN AN TIEN SI Y HOC GIA TRI CAC XET NGHIEM AMH, FSH VA AFC DU DOAN DAP UNGBUONG TRUNG TRONG THU TINH ONG NGHIEM



Nhận xét

Bài đăng phổ biến từ blog này

sách giáo trình công nghệ thông tin pdf doc - sách tham khảo

[-] Mục Lục 1 kế toán doanh nghiệp với visual basic https://ambn.vn/product/35662/ke-toan-doanh-nghiep-voi-visual-basic.html Những kiến thức cơ bản về kế toán như biểu mẫu, báo cáo, sổ sách chứng từ kế toán đã được trình bầy ở những bộ sách trước cùng tác giả, và coi như ở tập sách này là bạn đã nắm rõ về microsoft access và visual basic. Trong sách này, sẽ hướng dẫn bạn thêm khi thiết kế các giao diện nhập dữ liệu, xử lý và báo cáo trong chương trình kế toán, hiểu rõ những kỹ thuật và công cụ lập trình nâng cao và dễ dàng thiết kế thành công một chương trình quản lý kế toán doanh nghiệp bằng Visual Basic 2. lập trình cơ sở dữ liệu visual basic sql server https://ambn.vn/product/35577/lap-trinh-co-so-du-lieu-visual-basic-sql-server.html Cuốn sách này cung cấp cho người học những thông tin chi tiết cảu các công cụ kỹ thuật hiện nay như ADO, ADO MD và ADOX, MSDE, .. SQL Namespace.. Mục tiêu cuốn sách là cung cấp các kiến thức ở mức độ chuyên sâu những công cụ mà kết hợp giữa

Đề tài: Hoạt động marketing của công ty cổ phần bút bi Thiên Long

Đề tài: Hoạt động marketing của công ty cổ phần bút bi Thiên Long Mục Lục Lời mở đầu Chương I : Phân tích kết quả kinh doanh của công ty cổ phần tập đoàn Thiên Long I. Kết quả kinh doanh của công ty cổ phần tập đoàn Thiên Long trong thời gian qua II.Đánh giá hoạt động marketing của công ty cổ phần tập đoàn Thiên Long thời gian qua Chương II : Phân tích môi trường marketing của công ty cổ phần tập đoàn Thiên Long I. Phân tích môi trường marketing vĩ mô II.Phân tích môi trường marketing vi mô III. Phân tích môi trường marketing nội bộ IV. Phân tích swot Chương III. Phân đoạn thị trường của công ty cổ phần tập đoàn Thiên Long với sản phẩm bút bi Thiên Long I. Vị trí hiện tại của doanh nghiệp II. Xác định đối tượng khách hàng hay thị trường cần phân đoạn III. Phân chia thị trường theo những tiêu thức thích hợp IV. Đánh giá tiềm năng của các đoạn thị trường V. Lựa chọn các phương thức marketing nhằm khai thác các đoạn thị trường mục tiêu Chương IV. Xác định chiến lược M

CÁC YẾU TỐ ẢNH HƯỞNG ĐẾN KẾT QUẢ HỌC TẬP CỦA HỌC SINH TRƯỜNG PHỔ THÔNG DÂN TỘC NỘI TRỲ TỈNH CAO BẰNG

LUẬN VĂN THẠC SĨ: CÁC YẾU TỐ ẢNH HƯỞNG ĐẾN KẾT QUẢ HỌC TẬP CỦA HỌC SINH TRƯỜNG PHỔ THÔNG DÂN TỘC NỘI TRỲ TỈNH CAO BẰNG HỌC VIÊN: BẾ THỊ DIỆP – HƯỚNG DẪN KH: TS. NGUYỄN THỊ TUYẾT CHUYÊN NGÀNH: ĐO LƯỜNG VÀ ĐÁNH GIÁO TRONG GIÁO DỤC MỤC LỤC MỞ ĐẦU 1. Lý do chọn đề tài 2. Mục đích nghiên cứu của đề tài 3. Giới hạn nghiên cứu của đề tài 4. Phương pháp nghiên cứu 5. Câu hỏi nghiên cứu, giả thuyết nghiên cứu 6. Khung lý thuyết của đề tài 7. Khách thể và đối tượng nghiên cứu Chương 1: CƠ SỞ LÝ LUẬN CỦA VẤN ĐỀ NGHIÊN CỨU 1.1. TỔNG QUAN VẤN ĐỀ NGHIÊN CỨU 1.1.1. Các công trình nghiên cứu ở nước ngoài 1.1.2. Các công trình trong nước 1.2. MỘT SỐ VẤN ĐỀ LÝ LUẬN CƠ BẢN 1.2.1. Hoạt động học tập trong nhà trường 1.2.2. Loại hình nhà trường PTDTNT 1.2.3. Đặc trưng học sinh THPT DTTS 1.2.4. Các khái niệm công cụ của đề tài 1.3. KẾT LUẬN CHƯƠNG Chương 2: TỔ CHỨC NGHIÊN CỨU 2.1. PHƯƠNG PHÁP NGHIÊN CỨU 2.1.1. Tổng thể